Race for the Meuse

I just got my copy of Race for the Meuse.  Here's my envelope opening:
Some notes:

Postage.  Damn I hate paying massive postage charges, but the fact is that postage is expensive.  Race for the Meuse cost almost as much to send as it did to buy.  That's just a fact.   Thanks to George Kelln for sending this out.

The Map.  It's a beauty.  I hope it gets plopped on VASL soon because I want to get at it.  But it will be worth soloing.  Primarily, it's hills and valleys.  A couple of petite Belgian buildings.  It's a nice looking map reminiscent of Kampgruppe Peiper.

Scenarios.  There are five.  There are four small skirmishes for different parts of the map.  There is a "monster" which uses the whole map and has some German recon units against Belgian fort units.

Special Rule Pack.  Pretty generic stuff.  Alpine woods.  I don't like the partial orchard thing--basically an orchard on one side of a road.  Not many of these.  Not really a point in making new rules for it in my opinion.  I don't like the dedicated artillery rule, for reasons I have discussed many times.

Campaign Game.  This is pretty standard stuff.  A few surprises, but overall it's just a four scenario campaign game.  What kind of RG can you get?  Essentially, Germans can buy infantry platoons and a lot of armored car and recon assets.  The Belgians can by fortification support units.  Overall, looks like a small, do-able campaign game.  Smaller than most.

So, I'll be working on this solo until I get a VASL board for this.  I'll provide an update on how it is going.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Counter Values

Image
By The Numbers How were the three arguably most important numbers in ASL generated and why is there virtually no conversation about whether they are real? You can tell an ASL grognard 1 when you mention 666 and he immediately thinks of a first line US squad rather than the mark of the devil. Virtually all ASL players will know exactly what you are talking about if you give the three digits of its firepower, range and morale. Maybe less so of, for example, second line Italian squads. And, to be sure, there is a lot of overlap, for example, 447 squads. However, it is this defining characteristic that identifies units. How did these characteristics come about? Why are they so universally accepted and virtually never debated? Perhaps most importantly: Why do we go on adding squads (especially by third party producers) without laying down a basic understanding of what goes on in the composition of these factors? I propose a short exercise to help us understand...
Read more

Doesn't Add Up

Image
It's fair to say that I have a bias when it comes to ASL.  I am a Red Army man. I also like to have a little bit of fun poking the game designers over slights to the Red Army.  So why is it that the PTRD is so inferior to the Lahti ATR? The Soviet PTRD (Anti-Tank Rifle Degtyarov) was deployed in the Summer of 1941 as a cheap and quick replacement for the scads of anti-tank equipment the Red Army lost in the early phases of the war.  It used a powerful 14.5mm round that could penetrate 40mm of rolled plate armor at 100m--at 90 degrees.  Around 160,000 were produced before they became hopelessly outdated in 1942.  However, even afterward many units kept them available because they remained effective vs. halftracks and reconnaissance vehicles. This compares quite favorably to the penetration of the 37mm Pak deployed by the Wehrmacht which could penetrate 60mm of rolled plate at 100mm--again at 90 degrees. Yet, in ASL, the BTK numbers are 6 for the PTRD and 9 for th...
Read more