The Ship that wasn't a Ship

The HMS Sparrowhawk enjoyed the distinction of being the first aircraft carrier to launch an air attack that sank an enemy ship.  But she wasn't an aircraft carrier.  She wasn't even a ship.

At the time, she was known as RNAS Hatston.  Today, it's an industrial park on Mainland Island in the Scottish Orkneys, a bit north of Scapa Flow.  But at the time she was affectionately known by pilots as the HMS Sparrowhawk.
Fairey Swordfish torpedo planes taxi onboard the HMS Sparrowhawk





















On April 10, 1940, two squadrons of Skua dive bomber/torpedo planes took off from the Sparrowhawk toward Bergen, Norway.  In port was the DKM Konigsberg.

The Konigsberg was laid up in Bergen after being damaged by Norwegian coastal artillery during the initial attack on the city.  The Skuas were merely playing cleanup.
While unsinkable, the Sparrowhawk had an unfortunate, very low speed which prevented her from being of further use in the Norwegian campaign as the Skuas were at the very limits of their range for the Bergen attack.  Nevertheless, she continued to provide air cover for the vital Royal Navy base at Scapa Flow.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Counter Values

Image
By The Numbers How were the three arguably most important numbers in ASL generated and why is there virtually no conversation about whether they are real? You can tell an ASL grognard 1 when you mention 666 and he immediately thinks of a first line US squad rather than the mark of the devil. Virtually all ASL players will know exactly what you are talking about if you give the three digits of its firepower, range and morale. Maybe less so of, for example, second line Italian squads. And, to be sure, there is a lot of overlap, for example, 447 squads. However, it is this defining characteristic that identifies units. How did these characteristics come about? Why are they so universally accepted and virtually never debated? Perhaps most importantly: Why do we go on adding squads (especially by third party producers) without laying down a basic understanding of what goes on in the composition of these factors? I propose a short exercise to help us understand
Read more

Doesn't Add Up

Image
It's fair to say that I have a bias when it comes to ASL.  I am a Red Army man. I also like to have a little bit of fun poking the game designers over slights to the Red Army.  So why is it that the PTRD is so inferior to the Lahti ATR? The Soviet PTRD (Anti-Tank Rifle Degtyarov) was deployed in the Summer of 1941 as a cheap and quick replacement for the scads of anti-tank equipment the Red Army lost in the early phases of the war.  It used a powerful 14.5mm round that could penetrate 40mm of rolled plate armor at 100m--at 90 degrees.  Around 160,000 were produced before they became hopelessly outdated in 1942.  However, even afterward many units kept them available because they remained effective vs. halftracks and reconnaissance vehicles. This compares quite favorably to the penetration of the 37mm Pak deployed by the Wehrmacht which could penetrate 60mm of rolled plate at 100mm--again at 90 degrees. Yet, in ASL, the BTK numbers are 6 for the PTRD and 9 for the 37L.  Let's ex
Read more